Stefon Diggs’ male sexual assault accuser alleges that he has provided more than 100 pages of messages exchanged with the NFL star
The legal conflict between Diggs and his male sexual assault accuser is intensifying, as recent court documents indicate that the accuser claims to have provided over 100 pages of correspondence with the NFL star.
As per court documents acquired by TMZ, Christopher Griffith claims to have provided over 100 pages of text messages and social media interactions, which include discussions from iMessage and Instagram, during the discovery phase.
The filing follows Diggs’ assertion that Griffith did not supply their Instagram messages. Griffith countered, asserting that Diggs already has access to those discussions. Diggs, however, claims that Griffith has blocked him on Instagram, which has stopped him from accessing their prior conversations, and he has requested the judge to compel Griffith to provide the messages.
The lawsuit and countersuit
Diggs initially filed a lawsuit against Griffith for defamation, claiming that he disseminated false allegations that harmed his reputation. Griffith subsequently filed a countersuit, claiming that Diggs drugged and sexually assaulted him at the NFL player’s residence. Diggs has consistently refuted the claims.
The wide receiver initiated his defamation lawsuit in 2025, asserting that Griffith entirely invented the allegations for publicity. Diggs states that the allegations have negatively impacted him on both personal and professional levels, resulting in the loss of valuable business opportunities and endorsement deals after being publicly branded as a sexual predator. The case has evolved into a contentious legal battle, with each party alleging that the other has inflicted significant reputational and financial harm.
Griffith seeks access to Diggs’ financial records.
TMZ reports that Griffith has requested the court to compel Diggs to provide his financial records, a step that may assist in assessing damages in the current case. His legal team contends that the documents hold significance for both Griffith’s claims and Diggs’ defamation lawsuit.
The motion also alleges that Diggs did not fully engage in the discovery process. Griffith’s attorneys contend that Diggs should be required to provide financial documents they consider pertinent before advancing his lawsuit.
“Mr. Griffith eagerly anticipates demonstrating in court that, contrary to the narrative constructed by Mr. Diggs’ expensive New York attorneys, he is indeed the victim of Mr. Diggs’ unwelcome sexual advances and his brother’s violent assaults,” stated Griffith’s attorney, Jake Lebowitz, earlier.
