Psychologist Testifies That Football Legend Maradona Suffered from Bipolar Disorder
A psychologist testified in court that Maradona suffered from bipolar disorder and needed rigorous alcohol-free care prior to his death.
On Thursday, the trial concerning the death of Argentine football legend Diego Maradona took a significant turn when a psychologist testified that the late icon experienced bipolar disorder, exhibited narcissistic traits, and required strict abstinence from alcohol.
Carlos Diaz, one of seven medical professionals charged with manslaughter with reckless intent, stated in a Buenos Aires court that Maradona’s psychological condition played a significant role in shaping his treatment plan. Diaz, 34, faces allegations of prescribing unsuitable medication during the care given to the former footballer in the weeks prior to his death.
Local media reports indicate that Diaz emphasized the necessity of a zero-alcohol approach for Maradona’s condition, highlighting that even minimal consumption could lead to serious repercussions. He described his first encounter with the football legend on October 26, 2020—just weeks before his passing—painting a picture of Maradona enjoying a glass of wine in his home.
Diaz informed the court that he believed Maradona had shown a desire to enhance his lifestyle and that his treatment plan was centered on achieving sobriety. He also referenced toxicology findings, which indicated that the football icon had not used drugs for 23 days leading up to his death.
Maradona, considered one of the greatest footballers of all time, had a remarkable career with clubs like Boca Juniors, Barcelona, and Napoli and is best known for leading Argentina to triumph at the 1986 FIFA World Cup. He passed away on November 25, 2020, at the age of 60, shortly after having surgery for a subdural hematoma.
The current trial is investigating whether the members of his medical and care team hold criminal responsibility for his death. Neurosurgeon Leopoldo Luque was among those who testified, defending the choice to treat Maradona at home and clarifying that the setup was never meant to serve as an intensive care unit.
The ongoing proceedings keep the case at the center of public interest in Argentina, prompting wider discussions about medical accountability and the quality of care given to high-profile patients.
