A man says Diddy raped him during a private audition when he was 10 years old

A ten-year-old boy says that Sean “Diddy” Combs raped him during a private interview in the summer of 2005.

This is part of a new case against the rapper that was filed on Monday by a person who says they were raped but wants to stay anonymous.

There are many rape claims against Sean “Diddy” Combs since he was charged with federal sex crimes. This is one of them.

Diddy is said to have met the child without his parents’ permission and agreed to help him with his career.

Diddy was accused of raping another minor boy on Monday, this time he was ten years old at the time of the claimed event. The new case was filed.

The court papers show that Diddy’s accused went to see the rapper with the hope that he could help him get his music career going, according to TMZ.

Reports say the meeting took place at a hotel near Madison Square Garden without the accuser’s parents there. Diddy wanted to meet with the young boy alone to get a feel for him.

The victim tried to impress Diddy by singing a few songs during the meeting, and Diddy reportedly agreed to work with him in the end.

The rapper is said to have drugged the minor before hitting him.

Diddy is said to have asked the kid how badly he wanted to be a star after the interview.

It looked like the victim thought the rapper was trying to see how committed he was, so he said he was ready to “do anything.”

The papers say that it was during this talk that one of Diddy’s employees, who was also at the scene, gave the victim a soda.

The drink, however, made him feel “a little funny,” and he soon found himself having oral sex with Diddy.

The lawsuit said that the attack went beyond oral sex and included rape that happened while the victim was unconscious.

Diddy is said to have threatened to hurt the victim’s parents.

In the case, Diddy’s victim says that he woke up one morning with his pants undone and a tired feeling.

He knew right away that something was wrong and yelled for his parents. But the rapper quickly made threats against him, saying that telling them about what happened could have bad results.

It was said that the victim didn’t keep quiet and told his folks. But they were also afraid to press charges because they thought the rapper might do what he said he would do.

After the claimed sexual attack, the person who accused Diddy had terrible nightmares. He is now trying to get money for the emotional pain the rapper’s acts are said to have caused him.

The infamous music mogul was once accused of assaulting 25 minors.

Tony Buzbee, a lawyer in Texas who is representing more than 120 claimed Diddy victims, made a damaging claim about the rapper’s history with children earlier this month.

At the time, he told Page Six that Diddy had abused 25 children over the years, including a nine-year-old.

He said they went to see the rapper to try out because Diddy told them he would help them get their lives going.

Buzbee also said that his team has “gathered pictures, videos, and texts” that will help show that the attacks happened.

Diddy recently asked for a gag order to stop what he said were government leaks, but it was turned down.

The artist recently tried to get federal officials to keep quiet, but a judge recently said no.

Diddy is being held at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York, while he waits to be tried for sex trafficking, crime, and transporting people to work as prostitutes.

Page Six says that New York Judge Arun Subramanian turned down Diddy’s request and told everyone involved that they had to follow the law, which says that they can’t leak grand jury procedures because it can affect the fairness of the trial.

“To be clear, this order isn’t based on a finding that there has been any wrongdoing thus far, as the Court has made no findings at this juncture relating to defendant’s allegations that information related to the case has been leaked,” court papers said.

Then, “The point of this order is to help ensure that nothing happens from now on that would interfere with a fair trial.”