Clinton Refutes Awareness of Epstein’s Crimes, Supports Hillary During House Oversight Testimony

Bill Clinton informs the House panel that he observed nothing inappropriate, took no wrongful actions, and severed connections with Epstein following the 2008 plea.

Former US President Bill Clinton has categorically rejected any awareness of crimes associated with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, stating to lawmakers that he “saw nothing” and “did nothing wrong” throughout his brief connection with the disgraced financier.

During his opening statement to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on February 27, 2026, Clinton expressed that he was present for two key reasons: to honor the rule of law and to acknowledge the women and girls whose lives were adversely affected by Epstein.

“America was founded on the principle that no individual is above the law, including Presidents, particularly Presidents,” Clinton stated, encouraging lawmakers to place truth above partisanship and showmanship.

He admitted to knowing Epstein but maintained that their interactions were short-lived and concluded years prior to the public revelation of Epstein’s crimes. Clinton stated that he had “no idea” about Epstein’s activities and dismissed any implication that photographs or previous travel indicated any misconduct.

“Regardless of the number of photos you present,” he stated, “I am aware of what I witnessed and, more crucially, what I did not observe.” I am aware of my actions, and even more significantly, my inactions. I observed nothing, and I committed no wrongdoing.

Clinton emphasized that, even looking back, nothing in their relationship raised any concerns. “We are only here because he concealed it from everyone so effectively for such an extended period,” he remarked, pointing out that by the time Epstein’s 2008 guilty plea was revealed, he had “long ceased to associate with him.”

The former president also spoke about the subpoena of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, deeming it unwarranted. He stated that she had “nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein,” had no recollection of meeting him, never traveled alongside him, and never visited his properties.

“Including her in the subpoena, regardless of whether it was 10 people or 10,000, was simply not right,” he stated.

Clinton referenced his background in a household impacted by domestic abuse, asserting that had he been aware of Epstein’s actions, he would have taken decisive action.

“Having grown up in a household marked by domestic abuse, I would not have boarded his plane had I known about his actions. Instead, I would have reported him myself and advocated for justice regarding his crimes, rather than accepting leniency,” he stated.

During his statements, Clinton consistently highlighted the boundaries of his memory, informing lawmakers that he would refrain from speculating or making guesses while under oath.

“You will frequently hear me mention that I do not remember.” That could be disappointing. “I won’t speak on something I’m uncertain about,” he stated, emphasizing that it is a matter of integrity and duty to the American public.

Although he refrained from expressing enthusiasm about the questioning, Clinton informed the committee that he was ready to respond to inquiries “to the best of my abilities, consistent with the facts as I know them—the legitimate, the logical, and even the outlandish.”

“With that, Mr. Chairman,” he finished, “let’s proceed.”